Putting aside you said no counterpoint but rather purely trolled (which I’ll block you if you do again).. educated in what? Religious myths? Any evidence of Adam and Eve as claimed by several alleged “holy” books? Scientists that study evolution would gladly revisit their theories it someone actually had any. And this is hardly the only inaccuracy to be found in these alleged “holy’ books. The question arises why would any alleged “holy” books lie about something so primary as our origins? The logical conclusion is they are not ‘holy’ books anymore than the Church of Scientology’s Dianetics is a “holy” book.
If someone knocked on your door claiming someone if the distant past had secretly met deities different than the one you believe in and they were spreading it’s views would you immediate think it must be true? Of course not. Yet if someone else knocks on your door peddling your own religion with no evidence that’s different.
Ask any Muslim and they will tell you they chose to be a Muslim. You think is an accident that Muslim countries have such a percent Muslims or a result of conditioning? An accident that statistically most people of the Hindi faith are in India? Or that most practitioners of the Jewish faith are mostly in Israel? Or that most Christians are of European heritage? You know what the statistical odds of such a distribution pattern of religion by purely choice being a random coincidence? 1 to a number greater than the number of particles in the observable universe.
Your accusation of me of having”periscope”and myopic vision is particularly ironic. You think you have some “deep’ wisdom to impart with religion but have missed captain obvious… you have been played by con artist Mohammad. Belief in Mohammed as a religious figure is like France still considering Sun King Louis a “divine” figure.