It’s considered to be an anti-semitic representation of Jewish people. Banking and money lending existed in places like East Asia (China and Japan) having nothing to do with Jewish people at all. As well, I think organizations like the IMF, which do in fact exert global economic and financial control, are basically male white supremacists. However, the World Zionist Organization and the Jewish Agency for Israel and their innumerable affiliated non-profits and charities can fairly be said to be international / global and most definitely were set up to influence (intimidate, threaten, coerce, manipulate, deceive) governments and civil society into believing Zionist ideology and story telling. And there are groups affiliates with the World Zionist Organization and Jewish Agency for Israel who are terrorist groups and have been listed as terrorist groups, shell organizations being used for money laundering, etc. To be clear, these people are Zionists and people attracted to Zionists and Zionism for whatever personal motives, including criminal ones, obviously. Many Jewish people are highly critical of them, and possibly Jewish people are the most highly critical of them. But thanks for being straightforward about the long standing aggravation in Europe over Jewish usury. We now have central banks that regulate what amount of interest money lenders can charge to prevent usury. But it certainly does still occur in the private sector and, of course, organized crime. So, there is no reason to think that it did not occur previously and was widespread. I am sure there are historians who have looked into the realities of Jewish money lending practices and their social effects from antiquity till now. They would be the ones to give the real answers. Shakespeare, not so much.