Read on, Tzatz. For Waxman says the idea of a state in which Palestinians and Israelis live harmoniously is “unrealistic” but not “inherently problematic.”
The Article of course, goes on to conflate the truth (in a number of directions).
1/ Through the weasel words: The alternative is a two-state solution, which would create separate states of Israel and Palestine, an idea that originated in 1947. (Something that Palestine’s in-majority voice has steadfastly refuted, since as early as Mandate Power Britain’s Peel Commission recommendations.)
2/ And through an inclusion of an imaginative map – that would endorse the Trumpian View that contemporary Israel-Palestine’s now-lawful-territories include also Syria’s Golan Heights, their water resource and their associated wind resource.