If we were adhering to academic standards, you wouldn’t be posting an assortment of claims without sources. So, no…I’m not going to waste an unlimited amount of time replying to a hodgepodge collection of claims according to a higher standard than you set for yourself.
If you want to use the shotgun approach and just throw out a bunch of stuff to see what sticks, then you are welcome to do so, but its silly to think that others are obligated to go track down all of that and correct every part of it that is capable of being refuted.
If you want to narrow the scope and discuss one part then why don’t you start by explaining the contradiction of you saying that Gaza is not a state but then in the next sentence complaining that it should act like a state and abide by the laws of war? Make up your mind. Either it is a state and has the obligations of a state…or its not.