I referred to “legality” and “illegality” ; you have failed to respond to my point.
You now claim that the article is “negative” towards administrative detention but its use is “morally acceptable” because it is against a “clandestine enemy”.
Where is the “clandestine” element in an organisation that fights for its freedom over a vile savage JEWISH Israel state using brutal methods of control to maintain its illegal domination ?
Where is the “morality” in the JEWISH Israeli extension of detention to include children who throw stones ?
Where is the “morality” in the JEWISH Israeli use of “secret” evidence and “suspected intentions” as a raison d’etre for detention ?