“This well-argued piece draws on an array of facts and on expert opinions.”
from the article:
“This war lacks a clear objective, and it’s evident that we’re unequivocally losing it,” former Mossad deputy head Ram Ben-Barak told Israeli public radio on 18 May.
This war has a *very* clear objective.
Ben-Barak is the only “expert” I could find in the article,
and Israeli politicians’ objectives are out of his realm.
And I looked for a well-made argument which
justifies the headline and I couldn’t find any.
What argument were you thinking of when you wrote the above?
