Blinken has glaring conflicts of interest which diminish any ability he has to influence negotiations. He is Jewish and a publicly avowed zionist. How can he expect to be viewed as neutral? Strike 1.
The US is supplying weapons, political and diplomatic cover to Israel WHILE it is committing the genocide at the heart of the conflict. This nullifies any pretense by the US to paint itself as a neutral mediator. Strike 2.
US is threatening Iran to prevent it from exercising it’s LEGITIMATE right to retaliation on Israel after Israel killed a ceasefire negotiator ON IRANIAN SOIL. US is taking sides before any potential agreement Strike 3.
US is providing cover for Israel in the negotiations by deceitfully attributing Israel’s malpractice in the negotiations to Hamas instead of placing blame where it rightfully belongs on Israel. Strike 4.
In the face of all of this, what does US and Blinken expect to happen? They think nobody sees them?? Smdh
