1. Why should Palestinians are paying for sins of Germany?. They shouldn’t, but they also shouldn’t be paying for the pretentious ideas of British, Canadian and American patriarchs who think they can do whatever they want to whomever they want whenever they want because they control armies.
2. Does “never again” slogan apply only to Jews but not to Palestinians? Well from the Zionist perspective, ‘never again’ means Jews, but from everyone elses’ perspective it means never gain to genocide. Going further, as far as people like Starmer are concerned, and in keeping with the Zionist narrative, there can only be one genocide. And that was the Holocaust. Not a single genocide has been addressed by the UN since the Genocide Convention.
3. Why should Beni Khazar be allowed to colonsie Palestine? OK whoever that is. I am not up on the terms. Britain colonized Palestine. It had around 100,000 troops there. It trained Zionist terrorists that it let into its army through the Hebrew Battalion (the brain child of Jabotinsky). Those terrorists ended up attacking the British, and did things like blow up buildings (Menachim Begin – unabomber Begin) and assassinate British politicians. And so because the Zionist paramilitaries and terrorists were causing so much trouble for the British, they decided to abandon their duties to the League/UN. When they withdrew they left all their arms for the Zionist paramilitaries to carry out all the massacres and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. This is another problem. As far as the UK, US, Canada, etc. are concerned the events they were responsible for are water under the bridge. We know this resistance in Canada, because our government refused to engage in a Truth and Reconciliation process with our First Nations for years, and then only with great irritation, and not much, and then still refuse to settle the treaties they had been violating for 100 + years, and then, and then … it is still ongoing. Our First Nations has to take them to court for everything. Democracy is by the people, for the people, of the people. Do you think there is a single Western democracy that is that? No.